Ratings have deteriorated but this is because many countries have gained access to international debt markets. As the economist explains: "Last year there were 108 sovereign issuers; in 1983 there were only 14, all investment grade. By 1995 the proportion of issuers with investment grades had slipped to 78% and the share with Moody’s top mark, Aaa, had fallen from three-quarters to one-fifth."
Friday, April 3, 2009
Sovereign Bond Ratings over Time
From the Economist:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d812/0d8121b8d1d09874a06fb333daf7733f558ffcc6" alt=""
Ratings have deteriorated but this is because many countries have gained access to international debt markets. As the economist explains: "Last year there were 108 sovereign issuers; in 1983 there were only 14, all investment grade. By 1995 the proportion of issuers with investment grades had slipped to 78% and the share with Moody’s top mark, Aaa, had fallen from three-quarters to one-fifth."
Ratings have deteriorated but this is because many countries have gained access to international debt markets. As the economist explains: "Last year there were 108 sovereign issuers; in 1983 there were only 14, all investment grade. By 1995 the proportion of issuers with investment grades had slipped to 78% and the share with Moody’s top mark, Aaa, had fallen from three-quarters to one-fifth."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment